<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Enovlaw - Latest News</title>
<link href="https://news.prfree.org/rss/enovlaw/latest.xml"></link>
<updated>2026-07-21T22:45:49+00:00</updated>
<id>urn:uuid:aee3ca9d-93ce-006d-6fae-22df7ba0f21e</id>
<entry>
<title>To Mitchell or not to Mitchell...hold on, what is it ‘to Mitchell&#039;?!</title>
<link href="https://news.prfree.org/@enovlaw/to-mitchell-or-not-to-mitchellhold-on-what-is-it-to-mitchell-aeqm3x6arkdy"></link>
<id>urn:uuid:b37e56b3-c22d-0755-a676-4e130094b32d</id>
<summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article comments on the Court of Appeal judgment handed down at 2pm on Friday 4th July 2014 in the group of cases with the neutral citation [2014] EWCA Civ 906.]]></summary>
<updated>2014-07-23T12:00:39+00:00</updated>
</entry>
</feed>